Barack Obama Now Expects His Ego to Avoid Disaster
Unfortunately, the same incredible determination that allowed John McCain to survive NVN captivity, is not serving him well now. As a former pilot, he still thinks he can solve ANY international problem with bombing people in countries who are mere pawns in superpower geo-politics. He is as “certain” as Kerry about the good democratic intentions of a few paid Qatari mercenaries who think they can run a country better than Assad. They can’t.
“I know these people” McCain says… HOW? After a nice arranged chat one weekend where people with ulterior motives tell you stuff you want to hear? Show you how they can raise their arms and shoot AK-47s over a wall at a target they can’t see? Does he know that these “nationalist patriots” are paid by Qatar and Saudi Arabia to CREATE this phony civil war? Was that not in the briefing memo? HOW and WHY and FROM WHOM do a band of rebels get access to major military weaponry? The Idaho Militia can’t get that much weaponry.
According to Kerry, “WE KNOW Assad did it” and “We have no subsequent role.” Really? You REALLY think the American people, and the world are that gullible? Even McCain and armchair warrior Lindsey Graham say we HAVE TO remove Assad. So, Mr. Secretary, Which is it? Plan A or, you’re LYING about the plan? They are either blatant liars, or senile if they believe it themselves. Either way, enough is enough of their useless posturing “humanitarian strategy.”
Obama is either the biggest Trojan Horse in American history, or the biggest patsy. His lack of experience, qualifications for the job, and leadership become more apparent each month, and, finally, may make America question how he really ever got to be amateur President, and who arranged it?
[This is being written PRIOR to the congressional vote on authorization to use military force in Syria.]
At this moment, Obama and Kerry are promoting passage of the resolution. There is still time for Obama to hold true to the “principles” he espoused while a Senator and a candidate. So far, he has repudiated them so completely, it appears either he HAS no principles, or he lied about them to get elected. Maybe he has made an incredibly astute political maneuver to AVOID the shadow government’s manipulation of him. However, whether Pawn or Provocateur doesn’t really matter now. McCain and Kerry are selling; whether Obama buys, against his stated better judgement, will determine the balance of America’s 21st century.
Will that future include expecting the following ‘specific limited objectives’? (subject to future DOS, DOD, OMB revision)
The 2013 America’s Humanitarian Crusade & Military Tour – Syria Venue
Step 1: “We will bomb pre-announced CW-capable targets with cruise missiles, without civilian casualties, economic ruin or refugee displacement. There will be no regional consequences, nor risk of escalation or expansion outside Syria. We will then go back to business as usual, and focus on national priorities, like increasing our debt. Regarding replacement of the cruise missiles we will have launched, we have exempted from the sequestration restrictions any expenses we may indefinitely incur during this operation, because Qatar and Saudi Arabia have graciously offered to reimburse the US for all expenses related to the overthrow of Assad (which may inadvertently occur during the execution of our humanitarian mission.) Their altruistic and eleemosynary participation in this
crusadeeffort is admirable.
Step 2: “We intend to leave Assad in power with 250,000 kg of randomly dispersed CW, to which we are committed to deny access by the regime, and/or discourage Assad from using again…. in order to be accessible to and protected by one or more of the rebel groups…. Al Queda??? The “nationalist rebels” from Turkey, Hezbollah, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, & Afghanistan??? We have not yet decided which rebel leader we will install as the new democratically elected president of the free Syrian Hezbollah Islamic Triumvirate (S.H.I.T.) government. We will study that and report back to Congress, in executive seSSion within the 90 day non-war schedule.”
Step 3: (with appropriate bewildered reluctance and humility)
“Well, we better go in with boots on the ground after all… WE COULDN”T (Didn’t? Refused to?) ANTICIPATE that our arrogant morality policing could make matters worse, because after all, WE’RE AMERICA, and I’M OBAMA . ‘I said, once we started this we would need to finish it, so America and our troops need to back me up so ‘the presidency’ doesn’t lose face.’
Unfortunately, some of our naval ships used in our cruise missile non-war punishment exercise have been attacked WITHOUT PROVOCATION, which obviously demands a measured, augmented retaliatory response, or we will look weak. We have not been able to confirm the identity of the perpetrators as either Syrian regime or one of the rebel groups we have been supplying weapons to, but have HIGH CONFIDENCE that WE KNOW from RELIABLE INTELLIGENCE provided from NSA sigintel intercepted from a cell phone in a regime-supported brothel in a suburb of Damascus, that it was Assad. That we know that we know is certain, and we will bring them to justice… when we know what and who.
We have NO doubt that this will CONTINUE to be a limited engagement, no matter how long it takes, and that the American people will always SUPPORT THE TROOPS.”
[Proceed to MSNBC Photo Op and private pre-set Q & A, with Reading-Head-of-the-Month]
“Since our ONLY objective has always been protecting the Syrian PEOPLE from more gas attacks, our original NON-EXISTENT PLAN B has now evolved, based on conditions on the ground. Therefore, acting within the authority of the War Powers Act and Congressional authorization, we have put an additional 75,000 of our soldiers, on leave from Afghanistan and Pakistan, into selected Green Zones inside Syria, so THEY will be exposed to the CW rocket attacks, instead of Syrian women and children (depending on the wind), regardless of which rebel faction is currently in possession of these horrific weapons, which we expect to determine soon.
In fact, we can assure the American People that, by identifying from which direction our troops are attacked with these munitions, we will be in a better position to find and confiscate them. This accomplishes the main objectives we originally set forth in seeking Congressional approval for this historic humanitarian crusade, seventeen years ago.
We have also ensured the provisional government that dollar-denominated IMF loans will be made available for economic revitalization projects, including construction of a new regional LNG pipeline, in cooperation with our Saudi and Qatari partners. Several of our most experienced engineering firms, like Halliburton, will be dedicated to rebuilding a vibrant Syria, especially for those few remaining native Syrians still alive, who have been living in refugee camps in so many other countries. We owe it to them to build the best pipeline in the world. Under joint American/UK /JPM/Goldman-Sachs supervision, we will guarantee that.”
…These are venal politicians with an agenda. The enthusiasm they are bringing to their false moral crusade is scary, and MORE THAN a little mentally unbalanced. I don’t see that same enthusiasm from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Maybe he can convince these amateurs to stand down, from an ill-advised suicide mission for the military and the American People. If the government ( I Do not use the word ‘we’ or ‘America’ here) …If the government proceeds further, then it is time to review the impeachment clauses in the Constitution.
Any member of Congress who votes yes.
Certainly Obama, Biden, Boehner, Pelosi AND Kerry, especially if Obama goes AGAINST the will of Congress (an issue unto itself).
Avoiding the frightening potential for misuse of the Presidential Succession with a sliding scale of available mediocrity is essential for any hope of restoration of rational American foreign policy.
So…. who is Secretary of Agriculture?
If Bashar Assad really has used chemical weapons on his own people in a big way, America MUST intervene” – Headline in The Economist Aug 22 2013
Days after arrival of a UN inspection team, now on the ground in Syria, ready to inspect earlier reports of chemical weapons use, new reports claim 1300 new dead, without visible trauma.
A year ago this week, President Obama said that use of chemical weapons by Assad would be a game changer for direct US involvement in the civil war.
According to Vladimir Putin, sarin gas use has an equal potential to be used by the Al Queda-backed rebels to trigger American involvement.
Without disputing the tragedy of 1300 people in a Damascus suburb being gassed by sarin, does it make sense that Assad would be the one to risk the apparently SOLE action that would bring the US into the war against him? He has managed to maintain the upper hand for a full year since Obama’s announcement without using gas and avoiding the inevitable fate of Libya’s Moammar Ghadaffi. Why would he do it now while there are inspectors readily available to become the authoritative accusers against him?
The rebels, those of ‘eat the heart of your enemy on TV” fame, have made no progress in a year, unless destroying a large part of the economy and infrastructure of Syria can be considered progress. Perhaps they need to stage a real or ‘made for youtube’ gas attack to get some desperately needed help for their cause.
The time has come to question EVERYTHING that the media reports not as fact, but as propaganda intended to persuade the public to a pre-determined opinion or to anesthetize them with contradicting exposures. There are no independent, trustworthy, authoritative sources able to confirm or deny whether such attacks actually happened, and if so, who perpetrated them. Or is it just one more “Wag the Dog” scenario being played out here, simultaneous to so many in Egypt? Is there ANY trustworthy journalism LEFT in the world media? Or is everything now propaganda with a purpose?
I think there is likely very little confusion in the real agenda playing out in the Middle East, which may have little to do with the sideshow on the ground. There is a long term geopolitical process continuing in the region, about Big Power spheres of influence and long-term control of increasingly scarce oil/energy for the latter half of the 21st century. It began prior to World War 1. Regional history since then, and since the discovery of the world’s primary oil reserve, have just been a sequence of moves on a chessboard.
Israel, Palestine, Algeria, Suez, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Arab Spring… Move, countermove.
Jew, Arab, Muslim, Shiite, Sunni… bluff, counterbluff.
None of the on-ground tragedy is relevant to the manipulators of these events. People on both sides are expendable, and it matters not whether gas was used against established political and moral convention. If the gas attack is true, it is a tactic. Whether true or not, media coverage is also a tactic. By whom, for what is yet to be seen.
The stakes are much greater here, and no one is backing down. Timing is important here. This a proxy for the real events to come. Is it coincidence that the world’s monetary system is now more precarious than in 2007-8? All Mideast countries having upheavals simultaneously? Is this all building to a crescendo? Or is that just what we are supposed to think?
China, America and Russia are laying the groundwork for the next (strategic economic) world war, maneuvering for control over the essential resources of Central Asia and Africa. The battle grounds are in the worlds commodity markets, Central Banks, and geo-political flashpoints played out by surrogates, who have been duped not to see themselves as pawns. If there are Syrian rebels, troops, or civilian women and children who are foaming at the mouth, writhing in asphyxiation, and dying a horrible death this week, they are just the latest collateral damage caught in the crossfire.
The ‘stage’ has been literally ‘set’ so that America not only ‘should’ intervene, but now we “MUST”!
Is this the Pearl Harbor of Armageddon? And is it a real or staged media creation designed solely to CONVINCE us we “MUST”, so that we don’t consider “Who WANTS it and WHY?